Category:Comic Books - Revision history

https://asiancanadianwiki.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Category%3AComic_Books Category:Comic Books - Revision history 2026-04-21T04:30:34Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.39.11 https://asiancanadianwiki.org/index.php?title=Category:Comic_Books&diff=15279&oldid=prev 199.182.64.138: ovyeQtQuMbsMxsH 2012-12-23T10:18:55Z

<p>ovyeQtQuMbsMxsH</p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:18, 23 December 2012</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><PageSchema><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">However</del>, the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">fact that JSON </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">seeing so </del>much <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">ttorcian does show that there is some hope</del>. I <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">mean, </del>even <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">in </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">sorry state JSON is in</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">just 1 advantage (easy DOM access) has made </del>it <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">so popular in such a short amount of time</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">So it is possible </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">overthrow XML with something better</del>.<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Something designed with distributed extensibility </del>in <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">mind from </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">ground up </del>(<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">unlike XML and JSON</del>)<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">. Something with </del>a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">simple object model</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">yet powerful enough </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">express complex documents</del>.<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">It needs to be introduced cleverly though</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">probably as something </del>that <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">can piggy-back on the success of a often-used web language </del>:)<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">.</del><semanticforms_Form name="<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Buging</del>"><PageNameFormula><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Buging</del></PageNameFormula><CreateTitle>SUUrOYcgqyxAdKFQ</CreateTitle><EditTitle>vxTShCwXMQPCOm</EditTitle></semanticforms_Form><Template name="<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Buging</del>"><semanticforms_TemplateDetails><Label><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">TFEhridohUIUXmf</del></Label><AddAnotherText><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">WAwgYGiLmClsUb</del></AddAnotherText></semanticforms_TemplateDetails><semanticinternalobjects_MainProperty name="<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Buging</del>"/><Field name="<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Buging</del>" display="nonempty"><Label><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">qCQJoHiTuXrHRjQfkoD</del></Label><semanticmediawiki_Property name="<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Buging</del>"><Type><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Date</del></Type><AllowedValue><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">ZudjhcTZQQ</del></AllowedValue></semanticmediawiki_Property><semanticforms_FormInput><InputType><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">datetime</del></InputType><Parameter name="<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">FrUyUMmu</del>"/></semanticforms_FormInput><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">However</del>, the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">fact that JSON </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">seeing so </del>much <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">ttorcian does show that there is some hope</del>. I <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">mean</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">even </del>in the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">sorry state JSON </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">in</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">just 1 advantage (easy DOM access</del>) <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">has made it so popular in such </del>a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">short amount </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">time</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">So it </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">possible to overthrow XML </del>with <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">something better</del>.<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Something designed with distributed extensibility in mind from </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">ground up (unlike XML and JSON)</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Something with a simple object model</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">yet powerful enough to express complex documents</del>.It <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">needs </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">be introduced cleverly though</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">probably as something that </del>can <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">piggy</del>-<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">back on </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">success </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">a often-used web language </del>:)<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">.</del></Field><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">However</del>, the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">fact that JSON </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">seeing so </del>much <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">ttorcian does show that there is some hope</del>. I <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">mean</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">even </del>in the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">sorry state JSON </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">in</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">just 1 advantage (easy DOM access</del>) <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">has made it so popular in such </del>a <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">short amount </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">time</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">So it </del>is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">possible to overthrow XML </del>with <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">something better</del>.<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Something designed with distributed extensibility in mind from </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">ground up (unlike XML and JSON)</del>. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Something with a simple object model</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">yet powerful enough to express complex documents</del>.It <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">needs </del>to <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">be introduced cleverly though</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">probably as something that </del>can <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">piggy</del>-<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">back on </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">success </del>of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">a often-used web language </del>:)<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">.</del></Template></PageSchema>[[Category:Arts]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><PageSchema><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">If I'm honest</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">since </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">green teltpame you used (which was great), the site </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">less readable with every new release. The new teltpame looks good, but there's </ins>much <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">noise and you can't focus on the read</ins>.I <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">can't understand why the articles are </ins>even <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">less readable on the article page than on </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">front one. Of course</ins>, it<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'s for all the advertising you put on it</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">It's fine that you want </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">win a few bucks for making all this great free stuff, sure</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">You're </ins>in <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">your perfect right, but since the RSS can't read the full articles and </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">site is not readable enough </ins>(<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">at least, for me</ins>)<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, I have </ins>a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">problem :-/Probably the problem would be resolved by eliminating one of the columns in the article view</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">and giving more visual contrast </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the content</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The sponsored links and the Adsense are taking too much visual protagonism IMO.Anyways</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">thank you for all the effort you put here. I really appreciate </ins>that :)<semanticforms_Form name="<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Vinod</ins>"><PageNameFormula><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Vinod</ins></PageNameFormula><CreateTitle>SUUrOYcgqyxAdKFQ</CreateTitle><EditTitle>vxTShCwXMQPCOm</EditTitle></semanticforms_Form><Template name="<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Vinod</ins>"><semanticforms_TemplateDetails><Label><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">SWIpOrbmrN</ins></Label><AddAnotherText><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">pWPVIoyAzi</ins></AddAnotherText></semanticforms_TemplateDetails><semanticinternalobjects_MainProperty name="<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Vinod</ins>"/><Field name="<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Vinod</ins>" display="nonempty"><Label><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">nTGcXSMhTzRKHi</ins></Label><semanticmediawiki_Property name="<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Vinod</ins>"><Type><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Code</ins></Type><AllowedValue><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">iKIGGgOsEq</ins></AllowedValue></semanticmediawiki_Property><semanticforms_FormInput><InputType><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">category</ins></InputType><Parameter name="<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">oFZyeaPLoOvQA</ins>"/></semanticforms_FormInput><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">If I'm honest</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">since </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">green teltpame you used (which was great), the site </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">less readable with every new release. The new teltpame looks good, but there's </ins>much <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">noise and you can't focus on the read</ins>.I <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">can't understand why the articles are even less readable on the article page than on the front one. Of course, it's for all the advertising you put on it. It's fine that you want to win a few bucks for making all this great free stuff</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">sure. You're </ins>in <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">your perfect right, but since </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">RSS can't read the full articles and the site </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">not readable enough (at least</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">for me</ins>)<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, I have </ins>a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">problem :-/Probably the problem would be resolved by eliminating one </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the columns in the article view, and giving more visual contrast to the content. The sponsored links and the Adsense are taking too much visual protagonism IMO.Anyways, thank you for all the effort you put here</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">I really appreciate that :)</Field>If I'm honest, since the green teltpame you used (which was great), the site </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">less readable </ins>with <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">every new release. The new teltpame looks good, but there's much noise and you can't focus on the read</ins>.<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">I can't understand why the articles are even less readable on the article page than on </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">front one</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Of course</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it's for all the advertising you put on it</ins>. It<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'s fine that you want </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">win a few bucks for making all this great free stuff, sure. You're in your perfect right</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">but since the RSS </ins>can<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'t read the full articles and the site is not readable enough (at least, for me), I have a problem :</ins>-<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">/Probably </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">problem would be resolved by eliminating one </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the columns in the article view, and giving more visual contrast to the content. The sponsored links and the Adsense are taking too much visual protagonism IMO.Anyways, thank you for all the effort you put here. I really appreciate that </ins>:)</<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Template><Template name="Vinod"><semanticforms_TemplateDetails><Label>TFEhridohUIUXmf</Label><AddAnotherText>WAwgYGiLmClsUb</AddAnotherText></semanticforms_TemplateDetails><semanticinternalobjects_MainProperty name="Vinod"/><</ins>Field <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">name="Vinod" display="nonempty"><Label</ins>><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">qCQJoHiTuXrHRjQfkoD</Label><semanticmediawiki_Property name="Vinod"><Type>Date</Type><AllowedValue>ZudjhcTZQQ</AllowedValue></semanticmediawiki_Property><semanticforms_FormInput><InputType>datetimepicker</InputType><Parameter name="FrUyUMmu"/></semanticforms_FormInput>If I'm honest, since the green teltpame you used (which was great)</ins>, the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">site </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">less readable with every new release. The new teltpame looks good, but there's </ins>much <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">noise and you can't focus on the read</ins>.I <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">can't understand why the articles are even less readable on the article page than on the front one. Of course</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it's for all the advertising you put on it. It's fine that you want to win a few bucks for making all this great free stuff, sure. You're </ins>in <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">your perfect right, but since </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">RSS can't read the full articles and the site </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">not readable enough (at least</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">for me</ins>)<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, I have </ins>a <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">problem :-/Probably the problem would be resolved by eliminating one </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the columns in the article view, and giving more visual contrast to the content</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The sponsored links and the Adsense are taking too much visual protagonism IMO.Anyways, thank you for all the effort you put here. I really appreciate that :)</Field>If I'm honest, since the green teltpame you used (which was great), the site </ins>is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">less readable </ins>with <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">every new release. The new teltpame looks good, but there's much noise and you can't focus on the read</ins>.<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">I can't understand why the articles are even less readable on the article page than on </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">front one</ins>. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Of course</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">it's for all the advertising you put on it</ins>. It<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'s fine that you want </ins>to <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">win a few bucks for making all this great free stuff, sure. You're in your perfect right</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">but since the RSS </ins>can<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">'t read the full articles and the site is not readable enough (at least, for me), I have a problem :</ins>-<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">/Probably </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">problem would be resolved by eliminating one </ins>of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the columns in the article view, and giving more visual contrast to the content. The sponsored links and the Adsense are taking too much visual protagonism IMO.Anyways, thank you for all the effort you put here. I really appreciate that </ins>:)</Template></PageSchema>[[Category:Arts]]</div></td></tr>  </table>

199.182.64.138 https://asiancanadianwiki.org/index.php?title=Category:Comic_Books&diff=15272&oldid=prev 221.181.232.147: fpsIDspO 2012-12-21T04:40:13Z

<p>fpsIDspO</p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 04:40, 21 December 2012</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category:Arts]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><PageSchema>However, the fact that JSON is seeing so much ttorcian does show that there is some hope. I mean, even in the sorry state JSON is in, just 1 advantage (easy DOM access) has made it so popular in such a short amount of time. So it is possible to overthrow XML with something better.Something designed with distributed extensibility in mind from the ground up (unlike XML and JSON). Something with a simple object model, yet powerful enough to express complex documents.It needs to be introduced cleverly though, probably as something that can piggy-back on the success of a often-used web language :).<semanticforms_Form name="Buging"><PageNameFormula>Buging</PageNameFormula><CreateTitle>SUUrOYcgqyxAdKFQ</CreateTitle><EditTitle>vxTShCwXMQPCOm</EditTitle></semanticforms_Form><Template name="Buging"><semanticforms_TemplateDetails><Label>TFEhridohUIUXmf</Label><AddAnotherText>WAwgYGiLmClsUb</AddAnotherText></semanticforms_TemplateDetails><semanticinternalobjects_MainProperty name="Buging"/><Field name="Buging" display="nonempty"><Label>qCQJoHiTuXrHRjQfkoD</Label><semanticmediawiki_Property name="Buging"><Type>Date</Type><AllowedValue>ZudjhcTZQQ</AllowedValue></semanticmediawiki_Property><semanticforms_FormInput><InputType>datetime</InputType><Parameter name="FrUyUMmu"/></semanticforms_FormInput>However, the fact that JSON is seeing so much ttorcian does show that there is some hope. I mean, even in the sorry state JSON is in, just 1 advantage (easy DOM access) has made it so popular in such a short amount of time. So it is possible to overthrow XML with something better.Something designed with distributed extensibility in mind from the ground up (unlike XML and JSON). Something with a simple object model, yet powerful enough to express complex documents.It needs to be introduced cleverly though, probably as something that can piggy-back on the success of a often-used web language :).</Field>However, the fact that JSON is seeing so much ttorcian does show that there is some hope. I mean, even in the sorry state JSON is in, just 1 advantage (easy DOM access) has made it so popular in such a short amount of time. So it is possible to overthrow XML with something better.Something designed with distributed extensibility in mind from the ground up (unlike XML and JSON). Something with a simple object model, yet powerful enough to express complex documents.It needs to be introduced cleverly though, probably as something that can piggy-back on the success of a often-used web language :).</Template></PageSchema></ins>[[Category:Arts]]</div></td></tr>  </table>

221.181.232.147 https://asiancanadianwiki.org/index.php?title=Category:Comic_Books&diff=15133&oldid=prev Rparungao: Created page with "Category:Arts" 2012-11-07T22:58:47Z

<p>Created page with "<a href="/w/Category:Arts" title="Category:Arts">Category:Arts</a>"</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>[[Category:Arts]]</div>

Rparungao